Recent FDA approval of tenofovir-emtricitabine for prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as a form of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has led to concern about implementation of this strategy. Fifty years ago, a very similar national and international debate occurred when the oral contraceptive pill (“the Pill” or “OCP”) was approved. Contentious issues included OCP safety, cost, and the potential impact on sexual behavior—many of the same concerns being voiced currently about PrEP. In this article, we review the social and medical history of OCP, drawing parallels with the current PrEP debate. We also explore the key areas where PrEP differs from its forbear: lower efficacy, presence of drug resistance, and a more circumscribed (and marginalized) target population. A thoughtful approach to PrEP implementation, bearing in mind the historical insights gained from the 1960s, might serve as well as we begin this new chapter in the control of the HIV epidemic.
Authors: Julie E. Myers1,2 and Kent A. Sepkowitz3
1Bureau of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
2Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center
3Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Source: IDSA – clinical and infectious disease journal